Opinion

Section 230 is the best protection we have from Trump’s censorship

Thirty years ago, I co-wrote Section 230. Without it, goodbye retweets, Reddit mods, Wikipedia editors and curated feeds on Bluesky.
The Daily Dot

In their final act, Trumpers want to burn down everything they built

In the waning days of his presidency, Donald Trump declared an all-out war on the internet—and if he had gotten his wish, he would have burned down not just the internet as we know it, but the hive of ...
Opinion
Penguinz0 on MSNOpinion

Section 230 - law that keeps the web alive... they want it buried

Section 230 is the legal “shield” that lets regular people post without platforms getting sued into dust for every comment. Take it away, and suddenly everything becomes pre-approved, sanitized, and ...
Connecticut Post

Law that built the internet turns 30 – a legal expert explains what would happen if efforts to repeal Section 230 succeed

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Daryl Lim, Penn State (THE CONVERSATION) Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ...
Washington Examiner

Thirty years later, Section 230 is protecting the wrong people

Sometimes when my teenage son attempts to educate me about the internet, I find myself tempted to quote Aslan from The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, “Do not cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was ...